COLOR VISION IS ALTERED DURING THE SUPPRESSION PHASE OF BINOCULAR RIVALRYSMITH EL III; LEVI DM; HARWERTH RS et al.1982; SCIENCE; ISSN 0036-8075; USA; DA. 1982; VOL. 218; NO 4574; PP. 802-803; BIBL. 13 REF.Article

CONFIGURATIONAL DIFFERENCES IN STEREOVISIONBACON J; WALLACH H.1982; PERCEPTION (LONDON); ISSN 0301-0066; GBR; DA. 1982; VOL. 11; NO 5; PP. 607-613; BIBL. 4 REF.Article

RELIABILITY OF FIXATION DISPARITY CURVESCOOPER J; FELDMAN J; HORN D et al.1981; AM. J. OPTOM. PHYSIOL. OPT.; ISSN 0093-7002; USA; DA. 1981; VOL. 58; NO 11; PP. 960-964; BIBL. 7 REF.Article

MONOCULAR ASYMMETRICS IN VISUAL LATENCY AS A FUNCTION OF SIGHTING DOMINANCECOREN S; PORAC C.1982; AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPTOMETRY AND PHYSIOLOGICAL OPTICS; ISSN 0093-7002; USA; DA. 1982; VOL. 59; NO 12; PP. 987-990; BIBL. 21 REF.Article

LA DISPARITE DE FIXATION: PHENOMENE REEL OU ARTEFACT INSTRUMENTAL.PIGASSOU ALBOUY R.1983; JOURNAL FRANCAIS D'ORTHOPTIQUE; ISSN 0240-7914; FRA; DA. 1983; NO 15; PP. 31-35; ABS. ENG; BIBL. 7 REF.Article

FINELY GRADED BINOCULAR DISPARITIES FROM RANDOM-DOT STEREOGRAMSREADING RW; TANLAMAI T.1982; OPHTHALMIC PHYSIOL. OPT.; ISSN 0275-5408; GBR; DA. 1982; VOL. 2; NO 1; PP. 47-56; BIBL. 34 REF.Article

REHABILITATION OF A CLASSICAL NOTION OF PANUM'S FUSIONAL AREAKROL JD; VAN DE GRIND WA.1982; PERCEPTION (LONDON); ISSN 0301-0066; GBR; DA. 1982; VOL. 11; NO 5; PP. 615-619; BIBL. 8 REF.Article

DISPARITE DE FIXATION VERTICALE ET STEREOSCOPIEWEISS JB.1982; J. FR. ORTHOPT.; ISSN 0240-7914; FRA; DA. 1982; NO 14; PP. 93-98; ABS. ENG; BIBL. 2 REF.Article

HUMAN VERTICAL FUSIONAL RESPONSE UNDER OPEN AND CLOSED LOOP STIMULATION TO PREDICTABLE AND UNPREDICTABLE DISPARITY PRESENTATIONSPERLMUTTER AL; KERTESZ AE.1982; IEEE TRANS. BIOMED. ENG.; ISSN 0018-9294; USA; DA. 1982; VOL. 29; NO 1; PP. 57-61; BIBL. 10 REF.Article

FUSIONAL RESPONSE TO EXTRAFOVEAL STIMULATIONKERTESZ AE; HAMPTON DR.1981; INVEST. OPHTHALMOL. VISUAL SCI.; ISSN 0146-0404; USA; DA. 1981; VOL. 21; NO 4; PP. 600-605; BIBL. 7 REF.Article

FUSIONAL VERGENCE RESPONSE TO LOCAL PERIPHERAL STIMULATIONHAMPTON DR; KERTESZ AE.1983; JOURNAL OF THE OPTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA (1930); ISSN 0030-3941; USA; DA. 1983; VOL. 73; NO 1; PP. 7-10; BIBL. 12 REF.Article

THE STABILITY OF THE FIXATION DISPARITY CURVEDAUM KM.1983; OPHTHALMIC & PHYSIOLOGICAL OPTICS; ISSN 0275-5408; GBR; DA. 1983; VOL. 3; NO 1; PP. 13-19; BIBL. 20 REF.Article

THE DISPARITY GRADIENT LIMIT FOR BINOCULAR FUSION: AN ANSWER TO J.D. KROL AND W.A. VAN DE GRINDBURT P; LULESZ B.1982; PERCEPTION (LONDON); ISSN 0301-0066; GBR; DA. 1982; VOL. 11; NO 5; PP. 621-624; BIBL. 13 REF.Article

CLINICAL COMPARISON OF THE ZONE OF CLEAR SINGLE BINOCULAR VISION WITH THE ZONE OF ZERO-ASSOCIATED PHORIAGODIO LB; RUTSTEIN.1981; AM. J. OPTOM. PHYSIOL. OPT.; ISSN 0093-7002; USA; DA. 1981; VOL. 58; NO 12; PP. 1194-1198; BIBL. 11 REF.Article

ADAPTATION TO THE REVERSAL OF BINOCULAR DEPTH CUES: EFFECTS OF WEARING LEFT-RIGHT REVERSING SPECTACLES ON STEREOSCOPIC DEPTH PERCEPTIONSHIMOJO S; NAKAJIMA Y.1981; PERCEPTION (LOND.); ISSN 0301-0066; GBR; DA. 1981; VOL. 10; NO 4; PP. 391-402; BIBL. 29 REF.Article

COMMON CLINICAL CONFIGURATION OF ZONE OF ZERO-ASSOCIATED PHORIAGODIO LB; RUTSTEIN RP.1983; AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPTOMETRY AND PHYSIOLOGICAL OPTICS; ISSN 0093-7002; USA; DA. 1983; VOL. 60; NO 6; PP. 514-518; BIBL. 6 REF.Article

DISTRIBUTION OF STEREOANOMALIES IN THE GENERAL POPULATIONNEWHOUSE M; UTTAL WR.1982; BULL. PSYCHOM. SOC.; ISSN 0090-5054; USA; DA. 1982; VOL. 20; NO 1; PP. 48-50; BIBL. 3 REF.Article

VARIATION DE LA DISPARITE DE FIXATION CHEZ LES SUJETS HETEROPHORIQUES EN FONCTION DE LA DISTANCE D'OBSERVATIONDRAHON JM; ELIET F; URVOY M et al.1982; J. FR. ORTHOPT.; ISSN 0240-7914; FRA; DA. 1982; NO 14; PP. 169-178; ABS. ENGArticle

THE INTERPRETATION OF STEREO-DISPARITY INFORMATION: THE COMPUTATION OF SURFACE ORIENTATION AND DEPTHMAYHEW J.1982; PERCEPTION (LONDON); ISSN 0301-0066; GBR; DA. 1982; VOL. 11; NO 4; PP. 387-403; BIBL. 15 REF.Article

THE DEPENDENCE OF THE INDUCED EFFECT ON ORIENTATION AND A HYPOTHESIS CONCERNING DISPARITY COMPUTATIONS IN GENERALARDITI A.1982; VIS. RES. (OXF.); ISSN 0042-6989; GBR; DA. 1982; VOL. 22; NO 2; PP. 247-256; BIBL. 15 REF.Article

THE INDUCED EFFECT: ARGUMENTS AGAINST THE THEORY OF ARDITI, KAUFMAN AND MOVSHON (1981)MAYHEW JEW; FRISBY JP.1982; VIS. RES. (OXF.); ISSN 0042-6989; GBR; DA. 1982; VOL. 22; NO 9; PP. 1225-1228; BIBL. 10 REF.Article

BINOCULAR RIVALRY OF REAL VS. SUBJECTIVE CONTOURSBRADLEY DR.1982; PERCEPT. PSYCHOPHYS.; ISSN 0031-5117; USA; DA. 1982; VOL. 32; NO 1; PP. 85-87; BIBL. 20 REF.Article

DETECTION D'UNE DISPARITE DE FIXATION AU COURS D'UN BILAN ORTHOPTIQUEMARRET NG.1983; JOURNAL FRANCAIS D'ORTHOPTIQUE; ISSN 0240-7914; FRA; DA. 1983; NO 15; PP. 23-30; ABS. ENG; BIBL. 3 REF.Article

SIMULTANEOUS AND SUCCESSIVE CONTRAST EFFECTS IN THE PERCEPTION OF DEPTH FROM MOTION-PARALLAX AND STEREOSCOPIC INFORMATIONGRAHAM M; ROGERS B.1982; PERCEPTION (LONDON); ISSN 0301-0066; GBR; DA. 1982; VOL. 11; NO 3; PP. 247-262; BIBL. 2 P.Article

Effect of the background on the disparity-induced ramp vergence response in humansHAYAKAWA, Yuuki; TAKAGI, Mineo; IIJIMA, Atsuhiko et al.Ophthalmologica (Basel). 2006, Vol 220, Num 2, pp 94-100, issn 0030-3755, 7 p.Article